However, the emergence of androids and other smart machines designed for everyday life and entertainment can carry various threats and dangers. At the moment, most of the robots are remote-controlled toys. Yes, it’s popular now, but it looks more like fun. We have not yet created a robot that can completely replace a person, will not cause irritation, and will not require constant monitoring by a person automatic palletizer machine.

Basically, there is a request for advertising robots and entertainment machines right now. They are bought for entertainment or for the sake of some kind of chip that could attract customers to the mall. People came, saw the robot and advise their friends to come with the children to see it too – and so on. Interest, however, is rapidly waning. There is no sustainable positive effect yet due to the extremely limited abilities of such robots.

Secondly, this is a problem with autonomy: robots cannot work autonomously for a long time, they need recharging and power. Batteries make them heavier and more expensive. The third problem is the lack of budget sensors.

In fact, they have already entered and do not even give the feeling that it is a robot in front of us.

A 5-axis frequency-driven machine is a very complex robot, but no one calls it a “cutting robot”. Nobody calls a dishwasher a robot, they call it a dishwasher. The same is the plane on which you and I fly, where a live pilot is involved only during landing and takeoff – according to various estimates, from two to seven minutes.

Does it really exist, or is it a myth?

After all, there is an opinion that people living in Asian countries are immune to the ominous valley, so they often create anthropomorphic machines.

Both in the East and in the West live basically the same people. Yes, the mentality may differ from continent to continent, from country to country, but the effect of the sinister valley is familiar to everyone who has encountered humanoid robots. Many went to the wax museum, but the exhibits do not cause any disgust.

The ominous valley effect occurs in cases where there is automatic palletizer machine an unrealistic copying of a person’s movements, and immediately most people feel disgust. Nothing can be done about it yet. There are more than a hundred muscles on the human face that are responsible for facial expressions, and the degrees of freedom of modern robots are not yet enough to realistically simulate such facial expressions.

The reason why anthropomorphic machines are more often created in Asia is simple: in Eastern culture – in particular, in Japanese – there is a fetish associated with dolls, with ideal forms and faces.

As for the sinister valley, then, of course, we know how to deal with it by making humanoid robots. And we know for sure that yes – we will get into this valley.

My thesis is that it cannot be denied that technology is evolving. Even the first humanoid robot that we showed is very inferior to what we are doing now.

Humanity always has some kind of dreams at different periods of time. For example, to fly into space – it came true. The alchemists had a dream to find the philosopher’s stone and turn any metal into gold. Now people have a dream to learn how to create organisms similar to Automatic Palletizer Machine themselves.

Various scientists are working on this, but directly in robotics, the task of reproducing a person’s appearance has no special functional meaning. For the vast majority of tasks, it is sufficient to have a wheel or track drive. In general, now one of the main driving factors for the development of technology is military applications. For the same Boston Dynamics, funding for a long time came through grants from pro-government funds such as DARPA. Did you know that, for example, iRobot robot vacuum cleaners are made by a company that also makes military robots?

In my understanding, there are two main vectors of technology development, if we are talking about the development of robotics and artificial intelligence.

In fact, even three, since one vector can be divided by two. Everything can go in the direction of virtual reality. There are Automatic Palletizer Machine those who believe in this, they play their part in this, develop this direction. Just like we are developing another vector – the emergence of robotic assistants in the real world.

Both in the East and in the West live basically the same people. Yes, the mentality may differ from continent to continent, from country to country, but the effect of the sinister valley is familiar to everyone who has encountered humanoid robots. Many went to the wax museum, but the exhibits do not cause any disgust.

The ominous valley effect occurs in cases where there is an unrealistic copying of a person’s movements, and immediately most people feel disgust. Nothing can be done about it yet. There are more than a hundred muscles on the human face that are responsible for facial expressions, and the degrees of freedom of modern robots are not yet enough to realistically simulate such facial expressions.

The reason why anthropomorphic machines are more often created in Asia is simple: in Eastern culture – in particular. In Japanese – there is a fetish associated with dolls, with ideal forms and faces. As for the sinister valley, then, of course, we know how to deal with it by making humanoid robots. And we know for sure that yes – we will get into this valley.

My thesis is that it cannot be denied that technology is evolving.

Even the first humanoid robot that we showed is very inferior to what we are doing now. The second vector has two branches: the first is the development of helpers that can work with raw data and infrastructure. And it is all sharpened under anthropomorphism. Under the hands of a person, under the method of movement, dimensions, dynamics, stairs. Therefore, it is logical that the robot should have anthropomorphic features, have arms, legs, dynamic stabilization, and so on. That is, we are not sharpening a robot for infrastructure, but placing ourselves in a new environment.

In general, we conducted a study on the question of whether a robot should be like a human.

And it turned out that looking human when communicating is much more important than speaking humanly. We work a lot with Asian countries. But I have never heard that there was a fix idea to create robots similar. To a real animal or person. There is one professor who makes his lecturing doppelganger. Who also has a ghastly valley effect and disgust. But most companies make entertainment robots that look like cute Valley-style characters rather than humans. Think of the ASIMO android robot. Such robots are created as friendly human helpers.

In Asian culture, there are many cartoonish, “cute” characters that cause affection. So most robots do not look like a person, and there is no such intention. On the contrary, in many world religions man is sacred. For some people, it really is an object to love. There is nothing wrong with that, it is just a toy for people of any age.