A petition has been recorded in the Supreme Court looking for headings to make laws to manage social media platforms and to hold Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, and Instagram straightforwardly liable for spreading hate speeches and fake news. The public interest litigation (PIL), documented by advocate Vineet Jindal through advocate Raj Kishor Choudhary not long ago, looking for headings to the Center to outline laws for criminal prosecution of people engaged with spreading hate speeches and fake news through social media. This has again raised questions are social media platforms safe for people?

It mentioned the top court to guide the Central government to set up a mechanism for automatic removal of hate speeches and fake news inside a short time period with the goal that the counter creation of such hate speeches or fake news can be limited. The PIL further asked that the legislature is coordinated to select a specialist researching official for each situation enlisted for spreading hate and fake news through social media platforms.

“An enrolled account is adequate to begin a channel, which gives a platform of transferring recordings in the social media, for example, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and so forth, which implies anybody can glide anything in the social media, there is no limitation or control for their substance and there are no guidelines at all by the administration,” the plea said. The petitioner said that the plea was documented in wake of two tweets by the name of one Armin Navabi from his Twitter handle @ArminNavabi against Hindu goddess and utilizing insulting terms.

(Read More: Enhance Your Social Media Marketing By Following These Tips)

The petition presented that the right to speak freely of discourse and articulation is comprehensively perceived as the thought that each individual has the common option to openly communicate through any media and wilderness without outside impedance, for example, censorship and unafraid of retaliation, for example, dangers and abuses. “However, Freedom of articulation is a perplexing right, this is on the grounds that opportunity of articulation isn’t total and conveys with it exceptional obligations and duties, thusly, it might be dependent upon specific limitations gave by law,” the plea said.

“Social media’s scope is a lot more extensive than that of the conventional media. The right to speak freely of discourse and articulation under Article 19(1) of the Constitution goes inseparably with sensible limitations that might be forced under Article 19(2),” it added. The plea fought that it would be helpful for India to take a gander at the guideline principles actualized by different nations so as to present rules, which structure a harmony between the right to speak freely of discourse and responsibility of social media platforms.

(Read More: How To Advertise Through Facebook Effectively?)

“India has seen a lot of mutual viciousness before, but in the present season of social media, these hostilities are not simply limited to the territorial or nearby population, the whole nation is brought. The haze of bits of gossip, allusion, and hate that go about as fuel in a nearby collective conflict immediately spread across India through social media,” the plea said.  It said there had been a couple of horrific communal riots and social media has been assuming an unsafe function in actuating shared savagery in India and opportunity has arrived to check its abuse.

Conclusion: Social networking sites are a danger to public safety as they are utilized as instruments for drug dealing, illegal tax avoidance and match–fixing, terrorism, and prompting viciousness and for rumor tools, and so forth.